
The first of Dario Argento movies to become a video nasty in the 1984 UK cleaning up of the movie industry is the 1980 movie Inferno. The second part of a trio of movies that began with Suspiria and ended with Mother Of Tears (AKA Il Terza Madre – The Third Mother) ; the story is also Argento’s most disjointed, dull, and utterly beautiful movie of his career, all aspects meet like a terrible train crash, and despite the overall dullness you cannot help but keep watching.
On opposite sides of the world brother and sister Mark and Rose unearth a terrible secret based in a book called The Three Mothers, by coincidence they are both dangerously close to buildings that purport to be gateways to hell. While one will die, the other is left to pick up the pieces, solve a riddle and hopefully get away alive.
This Italian offering is like a who’s who of Italian movie stars, led by a couple of little known American movie stars in the form of Leigh McCloskey who plays Mark Elliot and Irene Miracle as his sister Rose. While most of the Italian cast are a little slapdash in their appearances being chucked in here, there and everywhere but with little actual use to the story. Gabriele Lavio appears and is quickly despatched to the other side, while Daria Nicolodi pops in and out of the story as she sees fit.
I’d like to say my confusion over Inferno was down to my ill-understanding of the movie but this is not the case, and sadly one I see raised in a number of reviews online. Even though the story is a little disjointed in both its cast use but in its general storytelling, the movie remains incredibly popular with Argento fans because there really is something about it.
The late great Lucio Fulci believed that actors were a secondary issue when it came to film making, he claimed their ability to act was not a key factor providing the suspense was right, and to a certain degree he was right from 1978-1983 he made a short run of some of the most infamous horror movies of all time, I can’t help that believe that when shooting began in 1980 Argento took part of this onboard, now I’m not saying that the actors in the movie are bad, simply that they are a secondary aspect in the movie, which is driven by incidents, lighting and special effects. When none of the previous aspects come raise their heads then Argento bangs in with a beautiful musical score. What is lacking in the movie is real depth, there are some great story ideas, like the book, and the two houses, both of which are surrounded by suspicious characters. But what fills in the gaps, what takes the movie forward? To be honest very little and it seems like Argento has become confused and caught on a split road between following Fulci and American director David Lynch.
There is another unusual factor about Inferno and that is in its music. Despite great collaborations with progressive rock band Goblin, and with the acclaimed composer Ennio Morricone Argento choose to go elsewhere for his music signing, heading instead this time to British rock band composer Keith Emerson of the band Emerson, Lake and Palmer. Emerson delivers a typically inspired piece of Argento music, jazzing up classical legends as well as injecting his own style to the movie. What is odd however is that of all the movies factors, the soundtrack is actually the biggest driving force.
Inferno was banned in the UK because of a scene in which a cat eats a mouse. Interestingly enough far gorier scenes were left in, including a scene in which a disable man drowns some cats, then having fallen over rats he is slowly devoured by them, calling for help a local roadside cafe owner comes running over, only to hack the disabled man’s head off with a knife.
Argento’s unique style is felt all over the movie, he choice of lighting, buildings and other structures make for a world you might never see in real life, it’s very 1970’s but also very good. Inferno rather like the previous chapter Suspria is like a moving work of art, the result being visually something that most popular directors aspire to.
Argento’s creepy characters like a disabled professor and his wacky nurse make for great viewing, but as I touched upon earlier all these characters were badly used. What is nice is the addition of Fulvio Mingozzi who was in most of Argento’s movies up until 1984’s Phenomena; like Suspiria here he plays albeit briefly a taxi driver, who like in most Argento movies never says a word.